From: Cyril Brulebois <cyril.brulebois@enst-bretagne.fr>
To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <20071129145458.GA25150@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org>

On 29/11/2007, Michael Banck wrote:
> I believe "buildd redundancy" does not mean having 2+ active buildds,
> but having at least one active buildd who can keep up, plus a possibly
> inactive backup buildd who could quickly be made active in case the
> primary buildd fails.

I'd add “having a responsive buildd maintainer”, uploading packages in a
timely fashion.

Cheers,

-- 
Cyril Brulebois